Tuesday, June 9, 2015

My Radioactive Dime





My Radioactive Dime






Alpha particle hits aluminum.

Aluminum releases neutrons.

Neutrons hit silver dime and turns it radioactive.

Silver dime releases gamma radiation.



Alpha particles turn Aluminum-27 to phosphorus-30 (*see footnote)

This is accompanied by awesomely unique neutron radiation. 

What's so great about neutrons? They can transmute elements by sticking to them and changing them, sometimes making them radioactive. Remember: alpha, beta, gamma and x-ray radiation stops when the source is taken away. Turn off an x-ray machine and it's safe to walk into the room. Turn off the microwave oven and you can stick your hand safely inside to get out your nice warm popcorn.

Neutrons are a tad different though: they can irradiate elements. Blast neutrons at silver and you get radioactive silver! Turn off the neutrons and the silver is still radioactive (for a couple minutes at least).


Neutrons turn Silver-107 to silver-108 with a half life of about 2.5 minutes.

Neutrons turn Silver-109 to silver-110 with a half life of about 25 seconds.

Each of these reactions is followed by a lovely blast of easily detectable gamma radiation.

All that sounds a little fancy, how hard was it to accomplish in real life? Well, it was very simple really:

I wrapped an old silver dime in foil and left it in an alpha particle bath for a few days. I then carefully slide it next to a Geiger Counter that was shielded with paraffin wax. The baseline only mildly rose from 10cpm (clicks per minute) to 20cpm...but it did rise!

After less than two minutes it settled down to 6cpm.

10cpm was the normal background radiation in the room.
20cpm was the gamma released by the irradiated silver.
6cpm was the background radiation being partially blocked by the (now) back to normal nonradioactive silver.

Removing the silver let the rate go back to 10cpm.

These readings are very low all around, but repeatable. Back when dimes were silver the American Museum of Atomic Energy had a coin irradiating machine: pop in your dime and it would be made radioactive (for a couple minutes). Neat! But by the time you let the museum your dime transmuted back to being a boring old coin...which is good because who wants radioactive coins in their pocket?

It wasn't as momentous as when I finally got my nuclear cloud chamber working, but I did feel a little like Dr. Frankenstein and I proved my source has alpha radiation by inference since my Geiger Counter can only detect beta, gamma and x-rays...not alpha or neutron radiation; but I know both were there because of the increased gamma radiation driving up the cpm count.

Why the choice of materials used? Neutron cross sections. This tells us how interactive am element may be with neutrons. The larger the cross section the more reactive it will be. Cross sections are measured in units called "barns" which are ten to the negative twenty-fourth power in square centimeters (very, very tiny).

There are fast neutrons that can be slowed down by big scatter cross sections, and there are slowed "thermal" neutrons which can actually interact with things (like my silver dime) of those things have a big absorption cross section.

Elements/isotopes with large scatter cross sections and low mass are great neutron moderators (slower downers).

Aluminum scatters at 1.5barns and Silver absorbs at 91barns.

It's all starting to make sense isn't it!

The insanely poisonous metal Beryllium that I'm waiting for the mailman to bring me scatters at 7.6barns but only absorbs at 0.007barns...and it's the fourth element in the periodic table, meaning it had a relatively low mass. All this makes beryllium a fantastic thing to shoot alpha particles at and have it blast neutrons out in exchange!

What else is the mailman bringing me? Paraffin wax laced with Boron. Boron scatters at a respectable 5.24barns, but it absorbs at 767barns!! That will slow down lots of neutrons down to the thermal range, meaning those neutrons can actually interact better with things (my dime for instance).


This is all much more fun than using a Geiger counter that can see alpha, or a neutron detector.

Inference and implication. Pasteur said that fortune favors the prepared mind. I'll be building a zinc sulfide spinthariscope that lights up when an alpha particle hits it.

You can also modify a cheap webcam to see similar sparks when the imaging chip gets slammed into by an alpha particle.

I once had an old wristwatch. I noticed that it didn't glow steadily in the dark but twinkled. The next morning I researched it and found that it was painted with radioactive radium!

Neutrons can be detected by tubes filled with helium, lithium, boron trifluoride or a couple other pricey gases. There are also bubble dosimeters that show bubbles in a test tube where neutrons (or cosmic rays) pass through it.

Photo magnifying tubes are like night vision versions of the webcam method. Plastic scintillators light up with hit by particles-much like the spinthariscope method.

It's more fun inferring from chain reactions just like the discoverers did: a weird result that could only be explained by a previously unknown particle.

That's what you get from homemade "junk" versus fancy store bought lab equipment.

The inferences of a prepared mind. The fortune which befalls it via convoluted paths chance, accident or routine, simple experiments yeilding unexpected results that are tested instead of ignored.

Prepare your mind and fortune may follow.

*A footnote on the initial alpha and aluminum foil interactions: when the alpha particle hits the aluminum it makes phosphorus-30 plus a neutron. The phosphorus-30 decays into the usually stable silicon-30 by emitting positrons, but the silicon in this instance decays by emitting gamma radiation. The positron will likely slam into an electron and give off more gamma radiation.



Below is some great information on some older NEUTRON DETECTORS (as opposed to Geiger Counters) which you may find used online. I snagged most of this info from a 1973 report to the US Atomic Energy Commission by Alex Lorenz. If you want to read the full report, it's available as a PDF online by searching "Review of Neutron Detection Methods and Instruments".

That document has more information on each device, including the method of detection (i.e. chemical composition of scintillator crystal, etc.). It' a great document to consult if you're like many people and find just a part/tube/probe of one of these devices and want to use it with a different base/amplifier/etc.

You'll want to pay attention as to whether your Neutron detector sees fast or slow neutrons--that makes a difference in whether or not you need to use paraffin or other moderators or actually have to remove those barriers and moderators from your experiment. You don't want to slow down your neutrons with paraffin if your device can only see the fast ones and vice versa.  


DEVICE                         RANGE                       VOLTAGE

Ludlum Fast neutrons 900v
(Model 42-2)
Eberline slow or fast neutrons 900-1200v
(Model SPA-2)
Ludlum  1/v for thermal neutrons 900v
(Model 42-1)
Kaman thermal & fast — 120v
(Model A-300) 0-14 MeV
Ludlum thermal - 12 MeV 900v
(Model 42-4)
IiUdium thermal & fast neutrons 900v
(Model 42-5)
LND thermal neutrons ?
(Series 900)
Ortec ? ?
(System 525)
Nuclear Instruments  Linear between ?
and Chemical Corp. 10^7 and 10^12 nv
(Model 3782)
Reuter Stokes Co 1 0^15  nv ?
Reuter Stokes Cd 5X 0 ^014 nv ?
Reuter Stokes Rh 10^15 nv ?
Reuter Stokes V 10^15 nv ?
Reuter Stokes 10^10  nv 1000-1400v
(RSN-337)  (thermal)
Ludlum thermal and fast 500-2400v
(Model 15) neutrons
Centronics <7.5x10^10 nv 1000v
(Type D.C. 12)
Reuter Stokes 3x10^4 to 2.5x10^5 800-900v
(RSN-17A/326/ (thermal)
330/251/327)
Reuter Stokes 10^4 to 10^11 800v
(RSN-229A) (thermal)
Reuter Stokes 10^4 to 10^11 800v
(HSN-234A-M1) (thermal)
Reuter Stokes 10^3 to 10^10
(RSN-15A/304/ (thermal) 100-1000v
325/332/306)
Reuter Stokes 10^3 to 10^10 200-800v
(RSN-314A) (thermal)
Reuter Stokes 10^8 to 10^14 20-150v
(RSN-186S-M2 (thermal)
and 316S-M5)
LND 3 decades
(Series 30771) 500v
LND 5 decades  200-800v
(Series 3077) Thermal (U235) 
or fast (U238)
(Series 3075) Thermal 200-500v
 (Series 3000, Thermal 50-500v
Series 3050)
Centronics 9x10^3 to 9x10^7 250-500v
(PFC 16A)
Texas Nuclear Thermal 800-1400v
(Series 9300
Texlium)
Eberline Dose response from 1600-2000v
(PNR-4 and thermal to 10 MeV
NRD-1)
Eberline 0.01-10^3 eV & 1300-1800v
(PNC-4)  0.2-18 MeV
Harshaw Thermal 1700-3400v
(Model series
B3, B6, B12, B14)
Reuter Stokes 10^-3 to 10^-5 2500-3500v
(RSN-7A/7S/44/ Thermal
177S-M7/320-M2/
108S-MG)
N. Wood Model G ? 1100-2300v
Centronics 3.3x10^3 to 6x10^6 900-1100v
(Series 5EB/6)
Texas Nuclear Series 9300 Texlium Thermal 800-1400v
LND
(Series 3000, Thermal 50-500v
3050)
Centronics PFC 16A 9x10^3 to 9x10^7 250-500v
Centronics PFC 16B 10^11 200-400v




Phew! That was a LOT of typing! Enjoy!




Name      What is it?                                                                           Distance traveled 
                                                                                                                    through open air
Alpha       Physical particle equaling a Helium nucleus                        2-3cm

Beta          Physical particle equaling an electron                                    2-3m

Gamma    Not radioactive decay, just energy burst                                500m
                   accompanying alpha or beta radiation.
                   The same as an x-ray, but arising from
                   different sources.

Neutron     Physical particle made up of 1 up quark and                   1000s of meters
                     2 down quarks.


Name   Symbol     Makeup                           Charge         Speed       Atomic Mass Units
Alpha     Î±             2 protons & 2 Neutrons       + +                Slow                               4

Beta        Î²               1 electron                                -              Fast or Slow                1/2000

Gamma  Î³                Photons/                           Neutral        Speed of light                   0
                           electromagnetic waves

Neutron n           1 up & 2 down quarks         Neutral      2.2km/S-14,000km/S         1
                                                                                                 (~5% speed of light)

Notes: 

An AMU (Atomic Mass Unit) is equal to 1/12 the mass of a Carbon-12 atom. 

Slow Neutrons are called "Thermal" and fast ones are called "Fast" neutrons. 

An alpha particle is double positive "++". 

Gamma rays are produced by atomic nuclei and x-rays are created by accelerating electrons, but they are basically the same type of wave energy. 


Lead only approximately halves the gamma/x-ray amounts. A 1/2" of lead stops about half the waves trying to get through. When beta radiation hits lead sometimes a new type of radiation is created that is more dangerous! This is Bremsstrahlung radiation (braking/deceleration). Lead barely interacts with neutron radiation, water or hydrogen-containing compounds such as common paraffin wax are much better shielding material.



Monday, June 8, 2015

Asymmetrical Cryptography...Falling Down The Trapdoor



Asymmetrical Cryptography...Falling Down The Trapdoor


Asymmetrical encryption relies on trapdoors: math problems that are easy to solve one way, but not the other. For example: 3+7.

Easy, that's 10 right? Right!

Congratulations, you just encrypted your secret message. Now the hard part is reversing it if you're a hacker.

The bad guy knows your answer is 10, and they know it is the sum of two numbers:

1+9=10?
2+8=10?
3+7=10
4+6=10
5+5=10
0.2+9.8=10?
3.6+5.4=10?
Etc.

Hmmm...even if you find the two numbers that solve the puzzle, you're not sure which set of two numbers (3 and 7) are the ones needed for the code. The idea is simple though. In our case we got it on the third try.

Okay, my new number is the sum of two numbers. I'll hide the first part and you play the hacker. What two numbers did I add to get 1,430,286,731,292?

Same exact principal and method, but now almost impossible to solve. Falling down a trapdoor is easy-being y back out is the hard part.

By the way, the solution to my last code:

1,430,286,731,292 =  2.1   +  1,430,286,731,288.9 



Did you guess it?

If you did guess it next time I'll multiply the numbers instead of adding them, or maybe divide them into each other three times then multiply by 2.345, etc.

But now you know what a trapdoor is in cryptography.



1973=meow




In the beginning...there were card catalogs.




In the beginning...there were card catalogs. 







Every book in the library had 3 cards typed or handwritten for it so they could be searched (by flipping through the cards) by either author, title or subject. A metal rod was run through the holes in the cards to keep them from being rearranged maliciously.



We finally wised up and got computers to do the job for us, because they're so easy to use-unlike pieces of paper. (Yes, the above really is a photo of my work computer screen, lol).

The Melvindale Public Library is down to clearing out its LAST small bunch of old cards, which we are using as scrap paper for patrons. I used 50 cards to create this modified (accidentally) polyhedral/rhomboidal lampshade:





The elementary Geometry: if you superimpose the rhombus (diamond) just right over the cards you only need 30 slotted cards and no scotch tape. That didn't quite (whoops) happen so 5 "plus-sign" shaped centers were needed to fill it out a bit better. The design works better with the proportions of poker playing cards, as done here: http://boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/50207/making-polyhedra-from-magic-cards-a-guide-with-t . 
















A MUCH easier intro to paper polyhedra (way cooler shapes that the average youngster could assemble) are available in printable templates that usually require only a single sheet of paper here: http://www.korthalsaltes.com/visual_index.php .


If you'd like one of these cards as a souvenir, they're in the scratch paper box next to the OPAC: Online Public Access (cardless computerized) Catalog. Once they're gone, they'll be gone for good. 


As of 10/1/2015 we've still got a small bunch left in the scrap paper box.

Sunday, June 7, 2015

BY THE ZOMBIFIED HORNS OF ISHTAR (VENUS)!



BY THE ZOMBIFIED HORNS OF ISHTAR (VENUS)!



(Okay, I know this isn't Ishtar, it's a bust of Nefertiti I'm restoring).

In my last post I mentioned that Mercury and Venus go through phases like our own moon. Here's a video Venus in about a half, but horned crescent phase that I took with a cellphone through a telescope back in April 2012. I mumbled the word 'Venus' into the microphone: 








The Mesopotamians/Babylonians/Assyrians knew that Venus (Ishtar the Queen of the Night) had horns sometimes. That's pretty astute viewing that ancients accomplished. 

In many ancient texts Venus/Ishtar threatens to raise all the dead so they can eat the living! High up, a changing, mysterious glowing god-menacing doom, destruction and devouring. 






Kitty would devour all the living, but she can't find a chair tall enough -meow!

TAKE THAT COPERNICUS! with a COMET LOVEJOY POSTSCRIPT.




TAKE THAT COPERNICUS! with a COMET LOVEJOY POSTSCRIPT.



The Moon has left the sky;
Lost is the Pleiads’ light;
It is midnight
And time slips by;
But on my couch alone I lie.


-Sappho (circa 580 B.C.)


Copernicus never saw Mercury? What follows are some of my quick photos of Mercury which serve to prove that I'm a better astronomer than Copernicus. 

Well...not exactly: you see, while Copernicus never bothered to write explicitly  in his journals that he did indeed see Mercury (I suppose he was much more modest than me ), he almost certainly did see Mercury! Further, he did extremely complex mathematical calculations which involved all he known planets--including the path of Mercury!

He did write in one of his works that were he was there was lots of fog in the mornings and evenings and lots of tall trees, etc. that made viewing Mercury difficult in Poland. "Difficult" as in annoying or hard, but not impossible. Remember, whenever Copernicus was trying to view Mercury (or any other star/planet) it wasn't for pleasure-he needed precise measurements so he could work on mathematical theories of planetary motion such as slight trepidations (oscillations) caused by gravitational forces and their orbits, etc. 

So, what did Copernicus do while in the foggy forests of his native Poland? He just wrote letters to his friends in other places who sent him measurements of their observations of Mercury. He then went inside his house and did maths. Very groundbreaking, difficult, awesome maths.

Even with a smartphone, calendar app and plenty of email alerts to notify me exactly when and where to look for Mercury it took me two years of trying! Mercury hugs our sun. Most of the year it's hidden in the blinding sunlight of day. However, a four to five times a year it strays just barely away from our sun so that you can aim a telescope at it (Mercury, not the sun) and watch it. You get a week to get it early in the morning and then wait months later to see it at sunset (meaning, literally like a few minutes after sunset).

I'm not a morning person, I sleep until 10am most days. So the morning appearances were ruled out. I had to wait for evening sunset Mercury appearances. The first few times I missed even seeing it as the 'bright star' everyone else (seemingly) on Earth was marveling at. I was at work (in a library) and grabbed my HUGE Konus 20x80 binoculars and ran out the front door:

  


So what did I see? Well, here's the thing: it was the same night that the International Space Station was flying overhead so everyone in the parking lot (an annoying large amount of people) were asking me about the ISS. I got so flustered (I'm shy) that I forgot I was using binoculars (which show a normal right-side-up image) and not a regular telescope (which shows an upside-down image). I kept going from Saturn up to Venus instead of Venus down to Saturn and a little further down to Mercury. It would have been so easy to see had I just swiveled down instead of up.

Another time I had everything lined up and just as the sky started to dim just a tad as our sun dipped below the horizon: boom, I noticed a HUGE tree limb in the way. I big tree, so I jumped in my pickup truck and drove about a mile away and STILL was blocked by other trees. Normally I would have been irritated but I just laughed it off, "now I know what Copernicus felt like". 

Finally, over a year later, I was able to see Mercury. I watched it for over half an hour! I used my big binoculars and it looked like a bloated, fat dot the color of pinky-orange Neapolitan ice cream:


There it is in the photo above. Dead center, the orangey-pink dot poking through the clouds. I took this picture by sticking my cellphone up to one of the eyepieces on my binoculars (which were on a tripod at the time).

After seeing it in my telescope I moved to my 8" Zhumell reflector telescope. What I saw was pretty amazing: it looked like the old Apple Computer logo: a three-color-striped blob with a bite taken out of it! Mercury goes through phases like our Moon and the planet Venus. Full round circle, mushed oval, crescent horn sliver, etc. At first I thought my telescope was broken, but no: being so low in the horizon made its light refract through the atmosphere (and smog) and get all distorted color-wise, and it wasn't in a full-round phase at the time.

I was so happy after my two year hunt that I forgot to take photos.

Here's one I took recently--it's a casual shot. Why? Mercury was right next to Venus so it was extremely easy to view. I grabbed a better eyepiece, put it in the telescope and just as I was about to look I noticed a wall of clouds coming: so I just peacefully observed instead of rushing to take a photo in the few seconds I had. Here's the crumby pic I did manage when Mercury was in a fuller phase and higher up in the sky:


Due to the bloat of Mercury, I'm thinking the above picture was taken with a 3mm or 9mm eyepiece in my 8" telescope. Anyway, that was at 6:30pm January 12, 2015. It was 19 degrees outside! So I went back in due to the cold and clouds. I was happy. 

Then at 9:30pm I ventured back out and was treated to The Comet Lovejoy just below the Pleiades! Each night during about a week-and-a-half of observations Comet Lovejoy moved closer and closer to the Pleiades. It looked like a hazy grey blob, possibly on one of the nights I may have sensed some slight green color-but no tail. Too much light pollution in Metro Detroit.

Anyway, that's why I started this post with the Sapho poem mentioning the Pleiades: it paved the way for Comet Lovejoy after viewing Mercury earlier in the night, along with Jupiter, Jupiter's four Galilean Moons: Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto; our own Moon, Venus and even the Orion Nebula (which was so bright it was visible with the naked eye as a blue smear). 

Not a bad night. Not a bad night at all...